From January 22 to March 30, do not miss Ahtila’s first French retrospective. A major figure of contemporary video art, Ahtila breaks the image of a self-sufficient art for art’s sake by inventing new forms of tales and storytellings.
In Paris, the Jeu de Paume gallery is organizing the first French retrospective of the Finnish artist Eija-Liisa Ahtila. Born in 1959, she immediately specialized in video art as a student in Helsinki, London and Los Angeles. But this category is still to identify. From its birth in the 60s, video art referred to -and against- the model of television. Its language was absolutely different from cinema: made of images considered in terms of flow and not in length, no longer edited horizontally but vertically, as a foliage. Wolf Vostell’s “Décollages” (meaning take-off and stripping at the same time) have shown that each video image could overlap an infinity of others and Nam June Paik’s do-it-yourself synthesizers made the most of the possibility of an unstoppable flux of self-generated images. The creation of video art was contemporary of the invention of new technics and of the democratization of its tools –Sony’s Portapak, which equipped many families, but also Fluxus ironic artists or wild Viennese Actionnists. It was the time for an art to identify itself, a very theoretical era where theory was meant to sharp art.
The era is not the same. Ahtila’s video works strikes by their neatness, not to say their typically Scandinavian coldness. Same bluish veil on frozen images. Of course, Ahtila’s work borrows to the fields of documentary, television, advertising and cinema : but it’s mostly because today we can’t distinguish those images anymore. Era has changed: cinema does not prevail anymore over other types of images and television supremacy is contested by other networks not as easy to control. And museum doesn’t prevail as a critical art: art has given up modernism self-sufficiency for images of the outside world and new forms of documentaries.
Ahtila’s videos always come in a multi-screening form (even if they can appear on one screen only on DVDs): the fact that the same subtitles run on each image allows the spectator to follow more than once the same screening, and to see each time a different film. Sometimes screens show each side of a room and surround the spectator, giving him at the same time the possibility to mentally edit the film on his own (as in Where is where, 2008, produced by the Jeu de Paume) ; sometimes the artist organizes the images on different screens, organizing one of them for storytelling and another for details, as in Consolation Service (1999). The films can relate a break-up or a mourning, themes we can recognize as the modern ones in cinema (Antonioni, Akerman, Garrel…): each time death comes home and disrupts realistic representations, as much as it moves deeply the characters who are depicted. Art invents new way of storytelling by mixing up different types of temporalities (testimonies, reconstitutions, myths…) : by disposing them side by side as in The Hour of Prayer, as if it was the same image running from one to another, and showing not a particular time, but a particular foliage of times and spaces.
Bastien Hader